DIA 2025 Global Annual Meeting

Component Type: Forum
Level: Basic

This session will explore perspectives on the future vision for pharmacovigilance. Examining how advances in technology and science can be leveraged to protect patient safety and will discuss what progress is being made against these ambitions.

Learning Objectives

Evaluate developments in technology being implemented by regulators to advance safety and surveillance of medicinal products; Discuss the importance of pharmacogenomics for introducing better risk mitigation strategies; Assess opportunities for better ways of working across different stakeholders in pharmacovigilance.

Component Type: Session
Level: Basic

An introduction to pharmacovigilance activities (with a focus of those beyond signal detection) along with considerations and approaches to mitigate, monitor, and evaluate potential signals in a real-world setting with use cases will be provided.

Learning Objectives

Explain the stages of Pharmacovigilance Beyond Signal Detection and Spontaneous Reporting; Describe Considerations for Planning for and Evaluating Post-Marketing Safety in a Real-World Setting.

Chair

Alicia Gilsenan, PhD, MS, RPh, FISPE

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

This session will introduce the latest efforts to enhance the quality of safety signal generation from government, industry, and academia (e.g., recommendations, regulatory frameworks, case examples) and will conclude with a panel discussion.

Learning Objectives

Explain the latest recommendations for reporting the results of safety signal generation (transparency, completeness) and relevant case example; Examine case examples to enhance the quality of safety signal generation in industry and academia: task process and methodologies; Discuss perspectives from government, industry, and academia to enhance the quality of safety signal generation.

Chair

Juyoung Shin, PharmD, MPH

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

This session will review the key REMS and EU Risk Management guidances issued during 2024. It will review the major strategic and operational impacts of the new guidances and describe practical applications of the new approaches they describe.

Learning Objectives

Review the overview and intent of key risk management guidances issued by the FDA and EMA; Compare the key differences and similarities in the approaches outlined in the guidelines; Identify key areas of activity for organizations to align with the intent of these guidances; Evaluate the key strategic and operational impacts of the guidances on participants' organizations.

Chair

Jamie Wilkins, PharmD

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

The pharmacovigilance (PV) ecosystem is fraught with noise, impeding a single source of truth for effective and timely safety surveillance of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs). However, multi-stakeholder partnerships can synthesize diverse needs and requirements to pilot a modernized future state.

Learning Objectives

Understand ICSR replication and duplication challenges to the ecosystem; Critically appraise a proposed concept for modernizing ICSR management to address challenges, enhance safety analysis, and facilitate a real-time learning healthcare system; Identify the stakeholder perspectives, modern methods and technologies, and change management needed to design and pilot a new ICSR paradigm.

Chair

Mayur A Patel, PharmD

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

Risk mitigation (RM) decisions commonly lack conclusive data and reproducibility. This session presents regulatory initiatives, TRIM, the first tool to support RM decision-making, and case studies of evidence-guided RM implementation and evaluation.

Learning Objectives

Summarize new initiatives that support regulatory decision-making on risk mitigation; Explain the use of pharmacoepidemiologic and decision-science approaches in developing an explicit risk mitigation decision tool; Discuss how qualitative and quantitative evidence can support REMS implementation; Compare study design options for formal REMS evaluation.

Chair

Almut G Winterstein, PhD, RPh, FISPE

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

We will leverage the PHUSE Safety Analytics Education library and the recent AE Groupings in Safety (AEGiS) white paper to operationalize the FDA Medical Queries and Standard Safety Tables and Figures (ST&Fs).

Learning Objectives

Operationalize FDA Medical Queries (FMQs) and Standard Safety Tables and Figures (ST&Fs) in safety reporting; Utilize the PHUSE Safety Analytics Education Library to enhance safety analytics; Leverage the PHUSE AE Groupings in Safety (AEGiS) white paper to improve adverse event groupings in safety analysis.

Chair

Greg Ball, PhD

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

Reporting of safety reports to FAERS using ICH E2B (R3) format. The presenters will discuss scenarios, system readiness, testing approach, challenges and lesson learned for a successful implementation and onboarding.

Learning Objectives

Recognize that FDA is live with E2B R3 standard and will require reporting of Investigational New Drug (IND) and postmarket safety reports to be submitted to FAERS. Describe how to prepare and be ready to submit electronically. Understand reporting scenarios, system readiness, testing approach, challenges and lesson learned both from FDA’s and industry’s perspective.

Component Type: Forum
Level: Basic

This session explores adverse event collection, processing, and actioning fundamentals as critical for integrating patient safety within teams, organizations, and the broader clinical research and patient care ecosystems.

Learning Objectives

Propose improvements within the drug safety landscape to adverse event reporting, processing, decision-making, and communication; Appraise stakeholder roles in protecting patients and promoting public health; Discuss opportunities for adverse event stakeholders to collaborate across the health care continuum (clinical development, safety, advocacy) to converge clinical research and clinical ca

Chair

Allison Cuff Shimooka, MBA

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

The session reports the CIOMS WG XII Benefit-Risk Balance for Medicinal Products that formulates key principles for lifecycle benefit-risk assessments to inform decision-making and further the development of medicines that patients need.

Learning Objectives

Provide an update on Benefit-Risk Balance for Medicinal Products issued by CIOMS WG XII; Learn about the conduct of high quality, balanced and comprehensive lifecycle benefit-risk assessments using the structured benefit-risk framework; Provide strategic guidance patient-centric benefit-risk assessment methodologies to improve transparency and understanding amongst key stakeholders.

Chair

Claudia Ana Ianos, MD

Speaker

speaker
James Buchanan, PharmD

Component Type: Forum
Level: Intermediate

This forum will explore the implications of ICH M14, focusing on practical approaches to using its data sources. Participants will examine how ICH M14 impacts various stakeholders and how collaboration between these groups can be enhanced.

Learning Objectives

Discuss and demonstrate the operational implications of ICH M14; Illustrate simplified and more practical approaches for utilizing the data sources introduced in ICH M14; Differentiate how ICH M14 impacts multiple industry stakeholders, including big pharma, small pharma, CROs, and data network providers.

Chair

William Blumentals, PhD

Component Type: Forum
Level: Intermediate

Despite advances in AI and Generative AI, its routine use in pharmacovigilance (PV) and high-risk applications is limited. This session will explore what’s needed to enable trusted use, highlighting technical challenges with multistakeholder input.

Learning Objectives

Demonstrate and discuss how Generative AI can facilitate the future approach in augmenting PV systems in a trusted, compliant, and transparent manner; Summarize the opportunities and challenges with such an approach.

Chair

Jens-Ulrich Stegmann, MD, RN

Component Type: Session
Level: Basic

This session will discuss the challenges in safety surveillance for medical devices relating to incident capture, data standards and terminologies. Looking at the impact on signal detection and how these barriers can be overcome to improve patient safety.

Learning Objectives

Describe challenges and barriers in the capture of adverse incident data for medical devices; Discuss novel approaches to enhance signal detection for medical devices; Assess opportunities for better ways of working across different stakeholders in device vigilance activities.

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

This session will review the 3Rs (replacement, refinement, reduction) of animal use in non-clinical drug development research, and how new technologies including AI, Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (VCGs) and organoids are introducing innovative ways to meet these ethical principles.

Learning Objectives

Understand the “3Rs” (replacement, refinement, reduction) of ethical animal use in non-clinical drug development research; Review how new technologies including AI, VCGs and organoids are being explored to follow these ethical principles as part of the overall drug development program.

Chair

Lindsay McNair, MD, MPH, MS

Speaker

How New Technologies are Being Developed to Align With Ethical Principles in Animal Research
Julie Frearson

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

This session aims to explore the application of AI to drug labeling to enhance pharmacovigilance, reduce medication errors, and improve patient safety. Presenters will discuss the complexities and share real examples from both end-user and technology perspectives.

Learning Objectives

Discuss opportunities to apply artificial intelligence (AI) to drug labeling to enhance labeling review, surveillance activities, and medication error reduction; Identify the complexities and barriers to applying AI techniques to modernize labeling-related activities.

Chair

Jim W. Barrett, PhD, MSc

Speaker

The Present and Future of Product Labels for Post Marketing Surveillance
Jim W. Barrett, PhD, MSc

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate

Planning safety reviews for a compound developed for multiple diseases is complex, requiring consistency across studies and analyses. A compound-level Data Monitoring Committee ensures unblinded safety review consistency, while an Aggregate Safety Assessment Plan (ASAP) supports post-study assessments. This presentation explores how an ASAP was implemented across a program to enable ongoing safety profile development as studies complete. It also introduces an interactive R Markdown application for real-time aggregate reviews, aligning with new draft regulatory guidance. This approach provides reviewers with access to program-level and individual study data during development, improving safety oversight. Key topics include the importance of coordination, teamwork, and standards to maintain a reliable safety database. A "year in review" will highlight lessons learned and enhancements made, concluding with an example of the application’s interactive capabilities.

Learning Objectives

Comprehend and apply the Aggregate Safety Assessment Planning (ASAP) concept to drug development and aggregate safety analysis; Implement the ASAP effectively within their organization; Identify and utilize the importance of an interactive application for performing ongoing aggregate safety reviews.

Chair

Robert (Mac) Gordon, MS